Similar to a dart thrower carefully planning his toss to achieve a bulls-eye, a practiced King County DUI lawyer performs his or her defense strategy consistently throughout trial. This consistency is particularly apparent in cross-examination, when a skilled DUI attorney can successfully manipulate a witness to support the defense’s arguments.
Defense’s Cross-Examination Goals
- To establish the defense’s arguments.
- To utilize the witnesses’ responses to questioning to ultimately provide support for these arguments.
- To control cross-examination in order to obtain concessions from witnesses.
- To use these concessions to support the defense’s promises made during opening statements.
- To introduce points that will be made during closing arguments.
- A defendant is on trial for driving under the influence of alcohol.
- During his DUI stop, the defendant declined several field sobriety tests posed to him by police officers.
- The King County DUI lawyer asked each juror to provide a possible reason why an individual would refuse to complete field sobriety tests, and noted that a few jurors mentioned nervousness and fear as a reasonable explanation.
Defense’s Focus During Cross-Examination
- Based upon the jury’s response, an experienced DUI attorney would most likely prompt the arresting officer to admit that his defendant appeared nervous and fearful when he refused the field sobriety examinations.
- Thus, the DUI lawyer’s line of questioning implies that his client had an innocent and rational reason for declining the law enforcement agents’ sobriety tests, which would probably support the defense’s opening arguments.
Overall, a refined King County DUI lawyer will recognize cross-examination as another tool the defense can use to contradict the prosecuting attorney’s arguments. If you are searching for a skilled lawyer who is able to use every tool in the DUI defense toolkit, call South King County criminal attorney today at (253) 709-5050.